Wingsail Development

Wingsail Development 

All sailing testing so far has been performed using the one sail. It was originally designed and made as a very conservative prototype, not trying to push the boundaries far.
Its been a tough and reliable sail, with its longest voyage being across Port Phillip over a couple of days.

Wingsail #1

Dimensions:

• Height 1000mm
• Chord Length 150mm
• Area 0.15 sq metres
• NACA 0015 (15% Chord)
• Weight 820g

Wingsail #1

Wingsail #2

This Wingsail was short lived. Not enough thought was put into its weight and the stability of the boat. I thought the stability margin was quite high and didn't need to be considered much.

That was very wrong !

Dimensions:

• Height 1100mm
• Chord Length 330mm max, tapering down to 165mm.
• Area 0.32 sq metres
• NACA 0018 (18% Chord)
• Weight 1298g

Wingsail #2 - too heavy

When Wingsail #2 was trialed in the water in a mild 10 knot wind, the boat simply laid over and wouldn't right itself. A big failure.

Stability Measurements

It was clearly important to stop assuming the stability margin would be ok, and actually take measurements.

A setup was established to measure the mast tip loading required to hold the boat flat at 90 degrees of heel.

With Wingsail#1, the mast tip loading was measured at 475g at a distance of 1210mm from the deck.

This sail has demonstrated good performance in strong winds.

With Wingsail#2, the mast tip loading was only 250g at the same height off the deck, and boat laid over in mild wind.

Wingsail #3

Wingsail #3 is the same size as Wingsail #2, but it has been designed to minimize weight and heeling moment while retaining as much strength as possible.

Dimensions:

• Height 1100mm
• Chord Length 330mm max, tapering down to 165mm.
• Area 0.32 sq metres
• NACA 0018 (18% Chord)
• Weight 980g

Changes:

• The printed components were all redesigned to reduce weight. Previously, the printed pieces were designed as mostly solid pieces, and printed with infill of about 10% to reduce weight, as well as incorporating large circular holes. The components were all redesign by shelling them to about 1.5mm.
  Continuous checks were made on the design of each component by performing the slicing operation and noting the length of filament that would be consumed, in order to estimate the weight of the finished item.
  The weight of the finished component was determined to be 7g per metre of filament, as reported by the slicer.
  The end result was a reduction of mass of the printed components by almost 50%.
• The film previously used was 250 micron A4 sized clear acetate film, used for binding documents. I'm now using 200 micron A3 sized film.
  This has plenty of stiffness for a sail of this size, and the larger A3 size allows for less overlapping seems, and hence a neater result with reduced weight.
• Lower the centre of mass.
  The electronics and the battery with its switch, were lifted on Wingsail#2 in an effort to ensure it was high out of the water. This was a mistake because of the significant cost in loss of stability.
  The battery and electronics are now as low as possible, while remaining forward of the mast.
• Lower the centre of mass.
  The tail section and the forward counterweight have been dropped by 200mm, so that they are as low on the deck as practical.
  This has a significant effect on stability.
• The 12mm aluminium mast has been replaced with carbon fibre.
  The carbon fibre mast now consists of  three sections:
• 500mm by 12mm OD and 10mm ID
• 500mm by 10mm OD and  8mm ID
• 1000mm by 8mm OD and 6mm ID
• The Carbon Fibre tubing fits nicely together as a press-fit, to form a tapered mast.
  The aluminium mast weighed 125g. The carbon fibre tapered mast weighed 76g.

Result

The new Wingsail #3 has a mass of 980g (roughly 320g less than #2).

It requires a tip loading of 500g to hold the boat flat a 90 degrees of heel. This is a great improvement, and is slightly higher than 475g of Wingsail #1.

Wingsail #3

Next Steps

The next step is to get the boat in the water for trials.
There is still room for improvement in reducing the heeling moment due to mass, by reducing the mass of the tail. This causes a second-order problem, because the counter-weight is unnecessarily large to balance the tail. Hence, any improvement in the weight of the tail should see almost a double improvement in overall weight.